Does anyone remember asking for radio talk show host Glenn Beck's opinion on what the Evangelical churches should be preaching, teaching, doing or thinking? I thought not. How would a radio talk show host know what is going on within any church except his own? Do we really set the agenda of the Kingdom of God by polls and felt needs? While some of his (rather obvious and predictable) subjects have partial merit, his delivery and automatic assumption of authority are painful to hear. That's one more reason to turn to a more Godly sound. One Pope is more than enough.
Blog of James Jordan, Minister and Instructor of Religion in the Piedmont Triad of North Carolina USA.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
Staying Blessed in Contentious Times
How is it possible to stay blessed in contentious times? As we see people mocking and scoffing, and raging against God's Word, how do we respond? It isn't by getting in the sewer with them! The Bible has a better answer in Psalm 1.
How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, Nor stand in the path of sinners, Nor sit in the seat of scoffers! But his delight is in the law of the LORD, And in His law he meditates day and night. He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, Which yields its fruit in its season And its leaf does not wither; And in whatever he does, he prospers. The wicked are not so, But they are like chaff which the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. For the LORD knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the wicked will perish.
Take this to heart, and may God show us the way to be more loving and helpful...
Happy because of Jesus,
Pastor James
How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, Nor stand in the path of sinners, Nor sit in the seat of scoffers! But his delight is in the law of the LORD, And in His law he meditates day and night. He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, Which yields its fruit in its season And its leaf does not wither; And in whatever he does, he prospers. The wicked are not so, But they are like chaff which the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. For the LORD knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the wicked will perish.
Take this to heart, and may God show us the way to be more loving and helpful...
Happy because of Jesus,
Pastor James
Labels:
advice,
blessing,
contention,
controversy,
God,
judgment,
Lord,
mockery,
opinion,
Psalm 1
Monday, August 3, 2015
Review of "Paul's Message and Ministry in Covenant Perspective" by Scott J. Hafemann
This
is a small collection of previously published essays which, although
varying in length, are consistently rich in content and challenging
in their clarity. The stated hope of the distinguished author is to
make the three fold covenant structure (which in his view is the
overall covenant and salvation historical backdrop that is
consistently elaborated by Paul) more apparent. He does so
indirectly (even stealthily) by means of the ever-important 2
Corinthians 3, its Biblical-historical backdrop, and its textual
companions. Readers will recognize the confluence of themes and
hermeneutical issues in this locus. The uniqueness of this
collection is the remarkable application of Hafemann's basic approach
(which is significant in its implications for Biblical
interpretation, Biblical Theology, and Pauline Studies) to divergent
Pauline issues, key Biblical texts and ecclesiastical contexts, in
one attractive small volume.
For
clarity the volume is divided in two roughly equal parts, Paul's
Message, and Paul's Ministry. Because the articles are arranged this
way, rather than chronologically, the reader can see the conceptual
unity of Paul's revelatory thought, as the reader (perhaps
surprisingly!) sees the presumption of the three fold covenant
structure tested across the various examples of related but diverse
scholarship. For a thoroughgoing and practical outworking of this
motif, see Hafemann's Biblical-theological primer, The God of
Promise and the Life of Faith: Understanding the Heart of the Bible
(Wheaton: Crossway, 2001). Although a detailed examination of
each article is surely deserved, here we will highlight only a few of
interest, bearing in mind the volume is designed for total effect
rather than individual reference per se.
Chapter
2 is the recently published “Reading Paul's DIKAIO-Language:
A Response to Douglas Campbell's 'Rereading Paul's DIKAIO-Language.'”
This is a most valuable chapter due to the unique interaction
between scholars of widely divergent approach. Hafemann begins by
arguing that a thoroughly eschatological response that says both “I
am” and “I do” is needed because of God's action of invading
(and continuing to invade) the lives of his people. Hafemann
demonstrates that Romans 2:13 and 6:7 are consistent and therefore
Paul's goal of creating covenant keepers and the determining
apocalyptic role of the Spirt are unified interpretive keys to Paul's
overall argument. The author shows how Paul's eschatological
view actually not only rejects the transactional component that
Campbell argues against, but also that this is literally consistent
with the argument of Romans itself! Hafemann shows via the Psalms
that in Romans 2, 4 and 6 (and 2
Corinthians 3 as the hinge between Galatians and Romans) there is a
conceptual-theological link between keeping the law, faith, and
obedience that is readily apparent (once one cleans the lenses of the
prevailing paradigm). However, Hafemann warns that in order to avoid
synergistic conceptions of justification one must keep the creative,
electing and liberating role of the Spirit in view.
“The covenant relationship between God and his people is not
legalistic at its inception, nor is it a synergistic contract in its
continuation. Every aspect of the
covenant is apocalyptic, since the covenant relationship is
wholly dependent on God invading and continuing to invade the
believer's lives to deliver them.” (p. 38)
Here Hafemann once
again lays the groundwork for a new paradigm for Paul because “what
matters in the new age of the new covenant is the new creation
brought about by Christ” and also “what matters is actually
keeping the law by the power of the spirit” (p. 41). This
biblical-theological analysis goes beyond the traditional view (with
it's emphasis on an implied legalism solved by imputation) and
strives “to recover the biblical category of an apocalyptically
understood, thoroughly monergistic, yet conditional covenant
relationship between God and his people.” (p.43). This essay is
concluded with Douglas Campbell's response, in which the differences
in approach are seen to remain.
One of Hafemann's
programmatic essays is “Paul's 'History-of-Redemption' Use of the
Old Testament in 2 Corinthians” which contends that in 2
Corinthians Paul's careful and contextual use of the scriptures
reveal that he was convinced that Jesus was already inaugurating a
Second Exodus by which God was now dwelling among his new
creation/new covenant community. The author clearly sees in Paul's
straightforward (!) exegesis of the Old Testament the authentic
foundation for the apostle's life and ministry which is expressed and
confirmed in his appeals to the church. “Thus to encounter Paul is
to encounter one whose life and labors were an extension of the
scriptural worldview from which he understood his universe.”p. 61
The exegesis and Biblical-theological evaluation here demonstrate
that the framework for Paul's thought, the basis of Paul's confidence
in ministry, and Paul's self understanding of his suffering are all
thoroughly Biblical (and not merely circumstantial) in their origin.
The
two following works trace the argument of 2 Corinthians 1-3, with the
latter devoted to 2 Corinthians 3:7-14 as an example of Paul's
“contextual Exegesis of the Old Testament.” These are informed by
Hafemann's earlier works Suffering and Ministry in the Spirit
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990) and Paul, Moses, and the
History of Israel (Peabody:
Hendrickson, 1996). Thus they demonstrate forcefully that the
backdrop for 2 Corinthians 3:7-14 is Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Exodus
34:29-35 as taken seriously and carefully interpreted by Paul. This
of course runs counter to the various presuppositions of Paul's
modern interpreters, most of which reinforce the idea of a diverse
evolutionary trajectory for scripture (not only Paul's thought) and
thus rendering salvation historical concerns artificial at best.
Contrary to this, Hafemann demonstrates in clear systematic fashion
how intra-Biblical exegetical methods, respecting a multitude of
disciplines, can reveal a more plausible interpretation free from
esoteric conjecture. Given the critical importance of 2 Corinthians
3:7-14 in Biblical Theological perspective, it is as if the author is
in some way giving the Bible back to the Christians as much as he
offers persuasive corrective direction to Pauline theologians in
academia!
“Paul's
'Jeremiah' Ministry in Reverse and the Reality of the New Covenant”
posits that Paul's
ministry is one of apocalyptic covenantal declaration and mediation,
as is shown by the context and content of 2 Corinthians 10:7-8. For
a variety of reasons scholarship in the late 20th Century
saw a contrast between “the apocalyptic Paul” and “the
covenantal Paul,” including the postulated structural and
functional disunity of 2 Corinthians. The author convincingly
demonstrates by examination of 2 Corinthians 10:7-8 that the purpose
of the ministry of the gospel for Paul is to call people to
repentance in light of the fulfillment of Jeremiah's ministry in
Paul's mission. Christian ministry today experiences this
eschatological reality by “establishing new communities of new
covenant believers.” Modern evangelical ministry (always groping
for a foothold in the surf of opinion) would benefit greatly if it
were informed by this more Biblical-theological understanding of
ministry, especially if it is clearly demonstrated by Paul himself.
The brevity of this article may conceal its significance.
“'Because
of Weakness' (Gal 4:13): The Role of Suffering in the Mission of
Paul'” argues exegetically that Paul's ministry is legitimated not
by only strict theological reasoning but also by the experience of
his own suffering. Since this is actual evidence (within the flow of
his argument) for his appeals to Christians, Paul “presupposes a
theological perspective and follows an apologetic pattern that is
pervasive throughout Paul's letters.” (p.117) This article
contains a detailed discussion of the key underrated section of
Galatians 4:12-20, arguing that Paul's mission and thought were
inextricably linked, and that Paul was a “theologically driven
missionary and a missiologically driven theologian.” (p. 132) This
essay explores many key interpretive issues, and thereby concludes
that Paul's words and actions brought about the Glory of God in
Christ in direct contrast to the cultural norms of his day.
“The
'Temple of the Spirit' as the Inaugural Fulfillment of the New
Covenant” concludes that “The Jerusalem temple provides a
template for understanding the covenant blessings and curses that now
pertain to the church as God's temple, since the spirit of the
living God now dwells within/among her.” (p. 151) Hafemann
shows again from another angle a prevailing “unity of theological
rationale” within Paul's thought. (p. 152) The focus once again is
the author's presentation of Jeremiah 31:31-34 as the interpretive
key for understanding the New Covenant context of 1 and 2
Corinthians. Of special interest is the assertion that this passage
“looks forward to what we now call a 'believer's church.'” (p.
156) Hafemann shows how the unconditional indicative acts of
provision work together with the imperative stipulations to empower
covenant keeping for the believers in Corinth. As Paul's argument
is carefully examined one can see how the convenantal structure
advocated here has profound application even with regard to the
themes of ethics and judgment and the presence of the Spirit!
The
main two parts of the volume have two corresponding summaries,
freshly penned by the author as he reflects on the totality of Paul's
message. These are well worth the price of the volume itself.
Hafemann sees sum of Paul's message as perseverance, and praise is
its goal. A deduction is that believers are to examine themselves in
light of their present perseverance, not in light of their past
efforts to be united to God. Therefore, the path to true
perseverance is a reliance on the practice of prayer and a commitment
to a reliance on the presence of the Spirit in one's life. As for
the second major division, the goal of Paul's ministry is the
proclamation of the clear necessity of Christ for all people.
Believers are called by Paul's letters to affirm God's faithfulness
to his promises in spite of all circumstance and opposition. These
two summaries work together with the overall arrangement of the
articles to present a deeply exegetical and Biblical-Theological
presentation of the unity of Paul's message and ministry which is
very accessible and encouraging to busy pastors and other Christian
workers.
Monday, July 27, 2015
The Surprising Children of Spong
This past week I heard another torturous talk from the venerable Bishop John Shelby Spong. This
talk was very much unpleasant, as he is an arrogant grumpy old man
full of vitriol for traditional Christian belief, who shores up his
views with outdated narrow scholarship combined with tabloid science.
And at the end of the talk he defiantly “claims the title” of
Christian. Typical of the venerable Bishop John Shelby Spong, you
say, so why be annoyed?
I thought most everyone was tired of hearing his routine. But then I realized his "gravitas" is giving some credibility to a view that is popular, as he was invited to speak at a recent “Progressive Christianity
Conference." His talk is titled “Why Atonement
Theology will Kill the Church.” It's not surprising that the
venerable Bishop John Shelby Spong denies Christianity the atonement
(on a quite spurious basis), but it is increasingly surprising to me that
there is no difference, in any substantive way, between many of the
venerable Bishop John Shelby Spong's views and the sentiments of say,
Reverend Brian McLaren, Reverend Rob Bell, or even, practically, Pastor Joel Osteen.
In other words, a more sugar-coated
delivery of the same ideas makes one popular. These are all crystal
clear examples of Christianity without Christ. Or, Christianity with
a Jesus more palatable to modern sensitivities and political
correctness. The venerable Bishop John Shelby Spong and his more
popular co-conspirators in the end want people to be free from the
idea that humanity has a sin problem that needs Saviour solution.
So what does the venerable Bishop John
Shelby Spong propose is the real problem? It is a doctrine of
“incompleteness” or “imperfection,” of “humanity in need
of its potential.” Sin is “not so,” but incompleteness is.
Nevermind the semantic games, this is no different than Emergent
leaders, no different than Osteen, or the Health & Wealth
peddlers. This tired old message is gaining new ground with
audiences who have no Biblical context, because it comes with a
built-in excuse for ignoring the Bible's basic overall message about
salvation through Christ. And yet, somehow, it still wants to be
Christian.
This is no different than the message
delivered to Eve, that she really needed to eat of the fruit of the
tree to be Godly; that God was, indeed, holding her back from her
full potential.
I think we all need to be very careful when we listen or read from many of today's popular and progressive teachers. There is a lot to say for being fresh and creative in applying the Bible to our everyday lives, but God may have a lot to say about being downright eager to re-write the clear overarching message of Scripture. It is apparent to me that many of these smart people don't want new applications of scripture, but they want different scriptures altogether!
The Bible says, “Test the spirits, to
see if they are from God.” Be sure you aren't one of those who will throw out both your common sense and the Bible. And always remember, we need to repent and believe the Gospel, because we must be born again.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
"A mist in the pulpit (still) becomes a fog in the pew."
You have to love Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages (Baker, 1980) by my former professor Haddon Robinson. How could we then imagine the thousands of sermons that would flow from our introductory preaching classes with Haddon and Dr. Scott Gibson? Those were the days...or rather, these are still the days! Preaching, with Biblical Theology, is a never-ending life-consuming pursuit. Today I'm reminded of why the basics are called the basics:
"Explanation proves difficult if the expositor does not know his audience. The more familiar he is with a subject, the less aware he may be of a congregation's ignorance of it. The people in the pew live in a different intellectual world from their pastor. Indeed they support him financially so that he can study what they cannot. He must not assume that his listeners immediately understand what he is talking about. He owes them a clear explanation of exactly what he means. As a guiding rule, a speaker should define every important term in language the audience understands. Certainly it is better to define too many terms than too few. Explaining the relationships and implications of ideas, we should know the explanation ourselves so clearly that no vagueness exists in our own minds. Then we should work through the steps in the explanation so that they come in a logical or psychological order. A mist in the pulpit becomes a fog in the pew." (p. 141)There should be no pride in preaching, but a sober and humble effort to both speak from the heart of God and speak to the hearts of people. Here's to continually clearing out the mist!
Labels:
audience,
basics,
Bible,
Biblical Preaching,
Church,
communication,
congregation,
expositor,
fog,
Gordon-Conwell,
Haddon Robinson,
homiletics,
humility,
Jesus,
mist,
pew,
preaching,
pulpit,
Scott Gibson,
sermon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


