Showing posts with label covenant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label covenant. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

On the 500th Anniversary of the Protestant Reformation, I say...


“God is not trying to drive us to despair by his demands, in order to take us from the 'Law' to the 'Gospel,' as if they were two different messages.” The God of Promise and the Life of Faith: Understanding the Heart of the Gospel, Scott Hafemann, p.216

 

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Samson's Challenge

In Judges 15:12 we witness one of the most disgusting circumstances in scripture.  Here the 3000 men of Judah render a predetermined verdict which they had no right to make.  It was a verdict that was a direct frontal assault on the glory of God.

They assumed that at this point in their struggle against God's enemies, the Philistine barbarians, that the issues of peace, safety, and security had centered on one person, Samson.  If Samson can finally be dealt with, then peace can be restored, the status quo can live on.

But no where in the equation is God's will considered.  When we think of the unconditional acts of provision that God has made on behalf of these 3000 men of Judah and all the children of Israel, we wonder why they wouldn't be on God's side.  After all, Samson is on God's side.  (Apparently many modern commentators/pastors don't agree, but assume Samson had "emotional problems." What do you think?)

Indeed, God was placing Samson as a judge over the people of Israel, and yet they believe they are the judges of Samson.  They evaluate his behavior, not the other way around.  They judge Samson's behavior as wrong, when in fact (even a casual reader should observe) the Philistines are wrong.  In dramatic fashion, the 3000 men of Judah bind their hero Samson and hand him over to their enemies and God's enemies, even to the point of doing the Philistine barbarian's dirty work for them.  This is disgusting by any measure.

Which side would you choose if you were there?  Again we ask, why in the world aren't these men on Samson's side?  Because they are directly disobedient to God.  They have the appearance of religion but deny it's power.  In spite of being the children of Israel, they are terrified of God's power, but they are willing to bow under the power of God's enemies.  Which would you choose?

When people want what they think is a nice enough life, and are afraid of stirring anything up, yet they believe that God's will would stir things up, which course of action do you think people will choose?

In my observation, this is why people very, very often equate their own lifestyle with the will of God.  They imagine that their particular lifestyle is the life of Christ.

Then, Christianity becomes the same as their own theological presuppositions and lifestyle. When the Bible calls their self-sufficiency into question they reject the message and kill the messenger.

See that Samson's sacrifice prefigures the sacrifice of Christ in some small way, where sinners handed over the Lamb of God so that even their sins could be taken away.  Status quo self-sufficiency that discounts the promises of God is nothing short of disobedience.  Unbelief is sin-  so don't be like the 3000 men of Judah.  Avoid Israel's mistakes.
 

Monday, August 3, 2015

Review of "Paul's Message and Ministry in Covenant Perspective" by Scott J. Hafemann


This is a small collection of previously published essays which, although varying in length, are consistently rich in content and challenging in their clarity. The stated hope of the distinguished author is to make the three fold covenant structure (which in his view is the overall covenant and salvation historical backdrop that is consistently elaborated by Paul) more apparent. He does so indirectly (even stealthily) by means of the ever-important 2 Corinthians 3, its Biblical-historical backdrop, and its textual companions. Readers will recognize the confluence of themes and hermeneutical issues in this locus. The uniqueness of this collection is the remarkable application of Hafemann's basic approach (which is significant in its implications for Biblical interpretation, Biblical Theology, and Pauline Studies) to divergent Pauline issues, key Biblical texts and ecclesiastical contexts, in one attractive small volume.
For clarity the volume is divided in two roughly equal parts, Paul's Message, and Paul's Ministry. Because the articles are arranged this way, rather than chronologically, the reader can see the conceptual unity of Paul's revelatory thought, as the reader (perhaps surprisingly!) sees the presumption of the three fold covenant structure tested across the various examples of related but diverse scholarship. For a thoroughgoing and practical outworking of this motif, see Hafemann's Biblical-theological primer, The God of Promise and the Life of Faith: Understanding the Heart of the Bible (Wheaton: Crossway, 2001). Although a detailed examination of each article is surely deserved, here we will highlight only a few of interest, bearing in mind the volume is designed for total effect rather than individual reference per se.
Chapter 2 is the recently published “Reading Paul's DIKAIO-Language: A Response to Douglas Campbell's 'Rereading Paul's DIKAIO-Language.'” This is a most valuable chapter due to the unique interaction between scholars of widely divergent approach. Hafemann begins by arguing that a thoroughly eschatological response that says both “I am” and “I do” is needed because of God's action of invading (and continuing to invade) the lives of his people. Hafemann demonstrates that Romans 2:13 and 6:7 are consistent and therefore Paul's goal of creating covenant keepers and the determining apocalyptic role of the Spirt are unified interpretive keys to Paul's overall argument. The author shows how Paul's eschatological view actually not only rejects the transactional component that Campbell argues against, but also that this is literally consistent with the argument of Romans itself! Hafemann shows via the Psalms that in Romans 2, 4 and 6 (and 2 Corinthians 3 as the hinge between Galatians and Romans) there is a conceptual-theological link between keeping the law, faith, and obedience that is readily apparent (once one cleans the lenses of the prevailing paradigm). However, Hafemann warns that in order to avoid synergistic conceptions of justification one must keep the creative, electing and liberating role of the Spirit in view.
“The covenant relationship between God and his people is not legalistic at its inception, nor is it a synergistic contract in its continuation. Every aspect of the covenant is apocalyptic, since the covenant relationship is wholly dependent on God invading and continuing to invade the believer's lives to deliver them.” (p. 38)
Here Hafemann once again lays the groundwork for a new paradigm for Paul because “what matters in the new age of the new covenant is the new creation brought about by Christ” and also “what matters is actually keeping the law by the power of the spirit” (p. 41). This biblical-theological analysis goes beyond the traditional view (with it's emphasis on an implied legalism solved by imputation) and strives “to recover the biblical category of an apocalyptically understood, thoroughly monergistic, yet conditional covenant relationship between God and his people.” (p.43). This essay is concluded with Douglas Campbell's response, in which the differences in approach are seen to remain.
One of Hafemann's programmatic essays is “Paul's 'History-of-Redemption' Use of the Old Testament in 2 Corinthians” which contends that in 2 Corinthians Paul's careful and contextual use of the scriptures reveal that he was convinced that Jesus was already inaugurating a Second Exodus by which God was now dwelling among his new creation/new covenant community. The author clearly sees in Paul's straightforward (!) exegesis of the Old Testament the authentic foundation for the apostle's life and ministry which is expressed and confirmed in his appeals to the church. “Thus to encounter Paul is to encounter one whose life and labors were an extension of the scriptural worldview from which he understood his universe.”p. 61 The exegesis and Biblical-theological evaluation here demonstrate that the framework for Paul's thought, the basis of Paul's confidence in ministry, and Paul's self understanding of his suffering are all thoroughly Biblical (and not merely circumstantial) in their origin.
The two following works trace the argument of 2 Corinthians 1-3, with the latter devoted to 2 Corinthians 3:7-14 as an example of Paul's “contextual Exegesis of the Old Testament.” These are informed by Hafemann's earlier works Suffering and Ministry in the Spirit (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990) and Paul, Moses, and the History of Israel (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1996). Thus they demonstrate forcefully that the backdrop for 2 Corinthians 3:7-14 is Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Exodus 34:29-35 as taken seriously and carefully interpreted by Paul. This of course runs counter to the various presuppositions of Paul's modern interpreters, most of which reinforce the idea of a diverse evolutionary trajectory for scripture (not only Paul's thought) and thus rendering salvation historical concerns artificial at best. Contrary to this, Hafemann demonstrates in clear systematic fashion how intra-Biblical exegetical methods, respecting a multitude of disciplines, can reveal a more plausible interpretation free from esoteric conjecture. Given the critical importance of 2 Corinthians 3:7-14 in Biblical Theological perspective, it is as if the author is in some way giving the Bible back to the Christians as much as he offers persuasive corrective direction to Pauline theologians in academia!
“Paul's 'Jeremiah' Ministry in Reverse and the Reality of the New Covenant” posits that Paul's ministry is one of apocalyptic covenantal declaration and mediation, as is shown by the context and content of 2 Corinthians 10:7-8. For a variety of reasons scholarship in the late 20th Century saw a contrast between “the apocalyptic Paul” and “the covenantal Paul,” including the postulated structural and functional disunity of 2 Corinthians. The author convincingly demonstrates by examination of 2 Corinthians 10:7-8 that the purpose of the ministry of the gospel for Paul is to call people to repentance in light of the fulfillment of Jeremiah's ministry in Paul's mission. Christian ministry today experiences this eschatological reality by “establishing new communities of new covenant believers.” Modern evangelical ministry (always groping for a foothold in the surf of opinion) would benefit greatly if it were informed by this more Biblical-theological understanding of ministry, especially if it is clearly demonstrated by Paul himself. The brevity of this article may conceal its significance.
“'Because of Weakness' (Gal 4:13): The Role of Suffering in the Mission of Paul'” argues exegetically that Paul's ministry is legitimated not by only strict theological reasoning but also by the experience of his own suffering. Since this is actual evidence (within the flow of his argument) for his appeals to Christians, Paul “presupposes a theological perspective and follows an apologetic pattern that is pervasive throughout Paul's letters.” (p.117) This article contains a detailed discussion of the key underrated section of Galatians 4:12-20, arguing that Paul's mission and thought were inextricably linked, and that Paul was a “theologically driven missionary and a missiologically driven theologian.” (p. 132) This essay explores many key interpretive issues, and thereby concludes that Paul's words and actions brought about the Glory of God in Christ in direct contrast to the cultural norms of his day.
“The 'Temple of the Spirit' as the Inaugural Fulfillment of the New Covenant” concludes that “The Jerusalem temple provides a template for understanding the covenant blessings and curses that now pertain to the church as God's temple, since the spirit of the living God now dwells within/among her.” (p. 151) Hafemann shows again from another angle a prevailing “unity of theological rationale” within Paul's thought. (p. 152) The focus once again is the author's presentation of Jeremiah 31:31-34 as the interpretive key for understanding the New Covenant context of 1 and 2 Corinthians. Of special interest is the assertion that this passage “looks forward to what we now call a 'believer's church.'” (p. 156) Hafemann shows how the unconditional indicative acts of provision work together with the imperative stipulations to empower covenant keeping for the believers in Corinth. As Paul's argument is carefully examined one can see how the convenantal structure advocated here has profound application even with regard to the themes of ethics and judgment and the presence of the Spirit!
The main two parts of the volume have two corresponding summaries, freshly penned by the author as he reflects on the totality of Paul's message. These are well worth the price of the volume itself. Hafemann sees sum of Paul's message as perseverance, and praise is its goal. A deduction is that believers are to examine themselves in light of their present perseverance, not in light of their past efforts to be united to God. Therefore, the path to true perseverance is a reliance on the practice of prayer and a commitment to a reliance on the presence of the Spirit in one's life. As for the second major division, the goal of Paul's ministry is the proclamation of the clear necessity of Christ for all people. Believers are called by Paul's letters to affirm God's faithfulness to his promises in spite of all circumstance and opposition. These two summaries work together with the overall arrangement of the articles to present a deeply exegetical and Biblical-Theological presentation of the unity of Paul's message and ministry which is very accessible and encouraging to busy pastors and other Christian workers. 


Thursday, February 26, 2015

Encouragement for Praying Christians


From Rolling Roads Baptist Church Reminder,  March 2015

“Encouragement for a Praying Church”

Our church is a busy place, full of busy Christians. We involve ourselves in many aspects of ministry and Kingdom of God work. In all our activity, we can't forget that one of the top priorities we have from God is praying. It is an honor for Christians to share one another's burdens (Galatians 6:2, 9-10). However, the “labor of prayer” is not for the faint of heart! If we take this work seriously, we will find how difficult it can be. Often prayers are not answered in the way we expect, and so we may become confused or discouraged. Sometimes we don't ever hear of an answer; we've just prayed in faith and left the answer to God. We are in danger sometimes of getting so engrossed in the details of situations people share, so that we almost forget to pray!
I believe strongly that the foundation for prayer is the promise of God. God is not unpredictable or capricious, as some would tell us. Rather, God's people are in a secure, unchangeable covenant relationship with Him through Christ. God has made manifold promises to His people. Among these are that He will not leave us hopeless in any circumstance. In Luke 11:13 Jesus says, “...how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him?” In Romans 15:13 Paul prays, “Now may the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that you will abound in hope by the power of the Holy Spirit.” So our labor of prayer is always an expression of hope-filled dependence on the God of promise, who loves us and gives His life to us. So no matter the challenges of prayer, may we always fulfill the commands of I Thessalonians 5:16-18, “Rejoice always; pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus.”

Happy because of Jesus,
Pastor James